March 21, 2025
March 26, 2025

Why Choose Apache Iceberg Over Traditional Table Formats?

March 21, 2025
March 26, 2025

Why Choose Apache Iceberg Over Traditional Table Formats?

No items found.

Listen to this article

Powered by NotebookLM
Listen to this article

Your database is fast – until it isn't. Traditional table formats choke on growing datasets, forcing full-table scans and sluggish queries. Even minor schema changes, like adding a column, can demand costly rewrites or downtime. Apache Iceberg solves these problems by managing massive datasets without the slowdowns common in legacy table formats. 

Read on to learn why Apache Iceberg is becoming the go-to choice for big data management.

Why Choose Apache Iceberg Over Traditional Table Formats?

Apache Iceberg is a modern table format built to handle schema evolution, partitioning, and metadata tracking without degrading performance. Traditional formats like Hive and Delta Lake often require full-table scans and rigid structures that slow down analytics. 

Table formats in data lakes define how data is stored, tracked, and accessed. They handle metadata to locate data, manage schemas, and organize partitions. Some formats use static structures with full-table scans, while others use more flexible methods. The main purpose is to keep data consistent and queries efficient, regardless of dataset size or underlying architecture.

The Advantages of Apache Iceberg

Apache Iceberg simplifies data management with a metadata layer to manage table structure that ensures accurate results, even with frequent changes. This approach makes it easier to maintain data consistency, handle concurrent queries, and adapt to growing workloads. 

Full ACID Compliance

  • Apache Iceberg provides full ACID compliance with engines like Spark, Trino, Flink, and Presto, and ensures reliable data management during concurrent reads and writes. 

Hidden Partitioning for Faster Queries

  • Apache Iceberg automatically improves partition pruning, reducing query execution time. This contrasts with manual partitioning in Hive and static partitioning in Delta Lake.

Efficient Metadata Management

  • Apache Iceberg avoids Hive Metastore bottlenecks with a lightweight metadata layer, making lookups faster. Delta Lake uses a growing transaction log, which can slow down queries over time. 

Schema Evolution Without Downtime

  • Iceberg allows adding, renaming, and deleting columns dynamically compared to Hive’s rigid schema constraints and Delta Lake’s log-based schema tracking.

Time Travel and Rollback Capabilities

  • Apache Iceberg tracks historical table states by storing snapshots with each data change. These snapshots allow users to query past data versions without affecting the current state. This capability helps with audits, debugging, and historical comparisons. 

Improved Reads and Writes

  • Iceberg uses file pruning and compaction for better query performance than Delta Lake’s merge-on-read approach, which can introduce latency in high-concurrency environments.
Feature Apache Iceberg Hive Delta Lake
ACID Transactions ✅ Yes, fully ACID-compliant across multiple engines ❌ No (Limited ACID support with Hive 3 and LLAP) ✅ Yes, but optimized for Databricks
Metadata Management ✅ Lightweight, scalable snapshot-based metadata ❌ Hive Metastore struggles with large datasets ⚠️ Log-based metadata can slow down over time
Schema Evolution ✅ Supports adding, renaming, and dropping columns without downtime ❌ Requires complex migrations and table rewrites ✅ Supports schema evolution but can introduce overhead
Partitioning ✅ Hidden partitioning eliminates manual maintenance ❌ Manual partitioning required, leading to slow queries ⚠️ Partition pruning improves efficiency but still requires user-defined partitions
Time Travel ✅ Snapshots enable querying historical versions easily ❌ No built-in support ✅ Supports versioning through transaction logs
Query Performance ✅ Optimized indexing and metadata pruning for faster queries ❌ Slower due to full table scans and partition limitations ⚠️ Can be efficient, but performance degrades with large transaction logs
Scalability ✅ Designed for petabyte-scale workloads with efficient metadata handling ❌ Struggles with large-scale datasets and high concurrency ⚠️ Scales well but can slow down with frequent updates
Concurrency Handling ✅ Multi-writer support with isolated transactions ❌ Concurrency issues without additional tuning ✅ Good concurrency but optimized for Databricks
Compute Engine Support ✅ Works with Spark, Trino, Presto, Flink, and others ✅ Works with Spark but not optimized for cloud-based scaling ⚠️ Best performance on Databricks, limited support elsewhere
Cloud & Object Storage ✅ Natively supports S3, GCS, and Azure Blob Storage ❌ Primarily designed for Hadoop-based storage ✅ Supports cloud storage but tightly coupled with Databricks
Use Cases ✅ Best for scalable data lakes, analytics, and ML workloads ❌ Legacy data warehousing, batch processing ✅ Good for Databricks users and structured data lakes

The Limitations of Traditional Table Formats

Traditional table formats like Hive and Delta Lake struggle with ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability) compliance, performance, and flexibility. They often fail to maintain data consistency during concurrent writes, they are unreliable on full-table scans for queries, and they require manual schema adjustments. 

Such limitations make it harder to manage large, dynamic datasets in modern data lakes. Here are the limitations that hinder performance, consistency, and flexibility:

Lack of ACID Compliance

  • ACID compliance is required to maintain accurate, reliable data in a data lake. Hive, even with Hive 3 LLAP, only partially supports ACID, which exposes tasks like updates and deletes to complexity, and errors. This can result in inconsistent or corrupted data when multiple users access the system simultaneously. 
  • While Delta Lake delivers full ACID compliance, it is optimized for Databricks, limiting its ability to neatly integrate with other platforms.

Performance Bottlenecks

  • Performance bottlenecks in traditional table formats can stem from metadata management. Hive Metastore slows down queries with more partitions and tables. This causes slower query planning and less predictable results. 
  • Delta Lake uses a log-based system to track changes, which improves query speed but struggles under high concurrency. These bottlenecks make it harder to support responsive analytics.

Scalability Challenges

  • Scalability becomes harder when table formats can’t adapt to changing workloads. Hive partitions slow queries when data is spread across many small files. 
  • Delta Lake uses an append-only log, but as the log grows, queries take longer to plan and run. This buildup makes queries slower and performance less consistent. 

Schema Evolution Complexity

  • Schema changes are often difficult with traditional table formats. Hive requires manual migrations when columns are added or modified, which can disrupt analytics. 
  • Delta Lake supports schema evolution, but frequent changes can slow down queries due to the added metadata processing.

Partitioning Limitations

  • Partitioning affects how quickly queries can find data. Hive requires that users manually define partitions. This can lead to slow queries if the partitioning strategy doesn’t match query patterns. 
  • Delta Lake improves this with partition pruning, which skips irrelevant partitions during queries. However, it still relies on manual partition definitions, and that makes it challenging to optimize with data structure changes.

Bottlenecks of Apache Iceberg

Apache Iceberg uses metadata files to track table states, and these files can grow large as snapshot history builds up. Unlike traditional formats where metadata issues stem from poor indexing, Iceberg's challenge comes from tracking many small changes over time. If snapshots aren’t regularly cleaned up, query planning can slow down. This requires teams to monitor and optimize snapshot retention to avoid performance issues. Here are some bottlenecks that can occur in Apache Iceberg.

  • Metadata Scaling & Dependency: Iceberg relies on metadata for performance, but inconsistencies can arise if metadata is not regularly updated.
  • Query Support & Analytics: Iceberg supports basic query types like GROUP BY and COUNT, but complex analytics require external engines like Spark or Presto.
  • Real-Time Data Ingestion: Iceberg is optimized for batch processing and does not natively support real-time ingestion.
  • Unsupported Features (Deletes, Streaming Sources & Sinks): Iceberg has limited support for deletes and updates. Any modifications require snapshot-based rewrites, which can be inefficient. Also, Iceberg does not natively support being used as a streaming source or sink.
  • Performance Issues with High Concurrency: Iceberg supports multi-writer transactions, but under high-concurrency workloads, commit conflicts and retries can cause delays.

Real-World Use Cases

Businesses use Apache Iceberg to process large datasets quickly, update information without interruptions, and handle high-concurrency workloads. Its design allows data to stay consistent even with frequent changes. Here are some real-world use cases of Apache Iceberg.

Customer-Facing Analytics

  • SaaS and e-commerce companies use Apache Iceberg to power dashboards and analytics. It ensures fast queries on large datasets without locking into a single query engine.

Large-Scale Event Data Processing

  • AdTech, IoT, and media companies handle massive event streams with Iceberg. It optimizes schema changes and partitioning, making clickstream and sensor data easier to query.

Machine Learning Feature Stores

  • AI and ML teams store and version training datasets with Iceberg. Its time travel feature keeps past data accessible, ensuring reproducibility in model development.

Financial Data Compliance & Auditing

  • Banks and insurers rely on Iceberg to track historical transactions. Its snapshot capabilities make audits and regulatory reporting more reliable.

Multi-Tenant Data Warehousing

  • SaaS platforms use Iceberg to manage data for multiple customers. It helps maintain data separation while enabling fast, scalable queries.

Retail and Supply Chain Analytics

  • Retailers and logistics companies use Iceberg for tracking inventory and shipments. It adapts to changing data structures, helping businesses adjust to demand shifts.

Cybersecurity and Threat Detection

  • Security teams analyze network logs and threat intelligence using Iceberg. Its metadata management makes large-scale forensic investigations faster.

Genomics and Scientific Research

  • Biotech and genomics firms process sequencing data with Iceberg. Its flexible schema evolution allows for fast-moving research without downtime.

Government and Public Sector Analytics

  • Agencies use Iceberg for urban planning, census tracking, and public data projects. Its versioning ensures reliable historical analysis.

Machine Learning and AI Workflows

  • Iceberg simplifies data management for ML training datasets, coupled with versioning and time travel helps in ML model reproducibility.

Realizing Data’s Potential with Apache Iceberg

Apache Iceberg offers a modern approach to table management by simplifying schema changes, automating partitioning, and ensuring reliable, consistent data access. Unlike traditional formats, it avoids performance bottlenecks and supports flexible, scalable analytics. 

Firebolt enhances these strengths by delivering low-latency and high-concurrency performance for businesses that rely on fast, accurate insights.

Firebolt overcomes Apache Iceberg’s bottlenecks:

  • Optimized Metadata Layer: Ensures instant lookups and zero-latency scaling, even with petabyte-scale datasets.
  • Advanced Indexing: Uses aggregated, sparse, and search indexes to minimize data scanning and speed up queries.
  • Automated Storage Optimization: Eliminates the need for manual or scheduled compaction of small files.
  • Optimized Write Performance: Handles high-concurrency workloads efficiently, reducing commit conflicts and write latency.
  • Automated Snapshot Management: Prevents storage bloat by automatically managing data retention and versioning.
  • Vectorized Query Execution & Adaptive Caching: Speeds up analytics by optimizing query execution for large datasets.
  • Beyond Table Formats: Apache Iceberg improves table formats with ACID transactions, efficient metadata management, schema evolution, and hidden partitioning. Firebolt builds on these capabilities with a cloud data warehouse designed for speed, scalability, and cost efficiency.
  • Blazing-Fast Queries: Firebolt optimizes query performance with advanced indexing, decoupled storage and compute instant metadata lookups, and high-concurrency execution. It eliminates bottlenecks that persist even with modern table formats like Iceberg, enabling sub-second analytics at scale.
  • Optimized Data at Any Scale: By combining Iceberg’s data lake optimizations with Firebolt’s high-performance querying, businesses can choose the right approach for managing big data and analytics workloads.

See how Apache Iceberg fits into your data strategy, book a demo with Firebolt.

Read all the posts

Intrigued? Want to read some more?